This is mainly meant as a useful test case, but might as well have it be
fun too. As an aside, it taught me a surprising result about the %v verb
in printf, and we'll have to decide if it's an issue we care about.
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46118
The interesting thing about this method is that it uses the simplepoly
API but has no input args-- only the output types are different. If it
had identical types in the input args, that might also have been
interesting, but it's more rare to have none. Hopefully this exercises
our type unification logic.
This ensures that docstring comments are wrapped to 80 chars. ffrank
seemed to be making this mistake far too often, and it's a silly thing
to look for manually. As it turns out, I've made it too, as have many
others. Now we have a test that checks for most cases. There are still a
few stray cases that aren't checked automatically, but this can be
improved upon if someone is motivated to do so.
Before anyone complains about the 80 character limit: this only checks
docstring comments, not source code length or inline source code
comments. There's no excuse for having docstrings that are badly
reflowed or over 80 chars, particularly if you have an automated test.
I seem to have forgotten to differentiate between the empty string and
no data because the zero value for the stored result was the empty
string. This turns it into a pointer so that we don't block the function
engine if a template or one of the other patched functions sends an
empty string as the first value.
This adds a giant missing piece of the language: proper function values!
It is lovely to now understand why early programming language designers
didn't implement these, but a joy to now reap the benefits of them. In
adding these, many other changes had to be made to get them to "fit"
correctly. This improved the code and fixed a number of bugs.
Unfortunately this touched many areas of the code, and since I was
learning how to do all of this for the first time, I've squashed most of
my work into a single commit. Some more information:
* This adds over 70 new tests to verify the new functionality.
* Functions, global variables, and classes can all be implemented
natively in mcl and built into core packages.
* A new compiler step called "Ordering" was added. It is called by the
SetScope step, and determines statement ordering and shadowing
precedence formally. It helped remove at least one bug and provided the
additional analysis required to properly capture variables when
implementing function generators and closures.
* The type unification code was improved to handle the new cases.
* Light copying of Node's allowed our function graphs to be more optimal
and share common vertices and edges. For example, if two different
closures capture a variable $x, they'll both use the same copy when
running the function, since the compiler can prove if they're identical.
* Some areas still need improvements, but this is ready for mainstream
testing and use!
We'd like to pre-compute the interpolation if we can, so that we can run
this code properly... For now, we can't so it's a compile time error...
Hopefully we can remove this restriction in the future. The problem is
the string must be a constant, or it would be possible to switch it from
"%d %s" to "%s %d %d" or anything that changes the type signature.
This unbreaks the mcl bindata code. Of course we could change the parser
to allow this prefix, but this is cleaner. The packages still have a
core prefix, which it seems we could also remove, but this isn't
particularly important for anything.
