pgraph, resources: Wait for innerWorker to exit cleanly
Don't run the Close() method until the innerWorker has exited cleanly. This is a guarantee which we make to the resources.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ func (g *Graph) Worker(v *Vertex) error {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// run the init (should match 1-1 with Close function)
|
||||
if err := obj.Init(); err != nil {
|
||||
obj.ProcessExit()
|
||||
// always exit the worker function by finishing with Close()
|
||||
if e := obj.Close(); e != nil {
|
||||
err = multierr.Append(err, e) // list of errors
|
||||
@@ -481,7 +482,12 @@ func (g *Graph) Worker(v *Vertex) error {
|
||||
wcuid.SetConverged(true) // starts off false, and waits for loop timeout
|
||||
pcuid.SetConverged(true) // starts off true, because it's not running...
|
||||
|
||||
go g.innerWorker(v)
|
||||
wg := obj.ProcessSync()
|
||||
wg.Add(1)
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
defer wg.Done()
|
||||
g.innerWorker(v)
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
var err error // propagate the error up (this is a permanent BAD error!)
|
||||
// the watch delay runs inside of the Watch resource loop, so that it
|
||||
@@ -511,6 +517,7 @@ func (g *Graph) Worker(v *Vertex) error {
|
||||
// NOTE: this code should match the similar Res code!
|
||||
//cuid.SetConverged(false) // TODO: ?
|
||||
if exit, send := obj.ReadEvent(event); exit != nil {
|
||||
obj.ProcessExit()
|
||||
err := *exit // exit err
|
||||
if e := obj.Close(); err == nil {
|
||||
err = e
|
||||
@@ -586,6 +593,7 @@ func (g *Graph) Worker(v *Vertex) error {
|
||||
//v.SendEvent(eventPoke, false, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
obj.ProcessExit()
|
||||
// close resource and return possible errors if any
|
||||
if e := obj.Close(); err == nil {
|
||||
err = e
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ type Base interface {
|
||||
Starter(bool)
|
||||
Poll() error // poll alternative to watching :(
|
||||
ProcessChan() chan *event.Event
|
||||
ProcessSync() *sync.WaitGroup
|
||||
ProcessExit()
|
||||
Prometheus() *prometheus.Prometheus
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -204,6 +206,7 @@ type BaseRes struct {
|
||||
processLock *sync.Mutex
|
||||
processDone bool
|
||||
processChan chan *event.Event
|
||||
processSync *sync.WaitGroup
|
||||
|
||||
converger converger.Converger // converged tracking
|
||||
cuid converger.UID
|
||||
@@ -322,6 +325,7 @@ func (obj *BaseRes) Init() error {
|
||||
obj.processLock = &sync.Mutex{} // lock around processChan closing and sending
|
||||
obj.processDone = false // did we close processChan ?
|
||||
obj.processChan = make(chan *event.Event)
|
||||
obj.processSync = &sync.WaitGroup{}
|
||||
|
||||
obj.waitGroup = &sync.WaitGroup{} // Init and Close must be 1-1 matched!
|
||||
obj.waitGroup.Add(1)
|
||||
@@ -351,12 +355,6 @@ func (obj *BaseRes) Close() error {
|
||||
log.Printf("%s[%s]: Close()", obj.Kind(), obj.GetName())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
obj.processLock.Lock() // lock to avoid a send when closed!
|
||||
obj.processDone = true
|
||||
close(obj.processChan)
|
||||
obj.processLock.Unlock()
|
||||
// a Wait() for processChan to close is unnecessary I think...
|
||||
|
||||
obj.pcuid.Unregister()
|
||||
obj.wcuid.Unregister()
|
||||
obj.cuid.Unregister()
|
||||
@@ -466,8 +464,18 @@ func (obj *BaseRes) StateOK(b bool) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ProcessChan returns the chan that resources send events to. Internal API!
|
||||
func (obj *BaseRes) ProcessChan() chan *event.Event {
|
||||
return obj.processChan
|
||||
func (obj *BaseRes) ProcessChan() chan *event.Event { return obj.processChan }
|
||||
|
||||
// ProcessSync returns the WaitGroup that blocks until the innerWorker closes.
|
||||
func (obj *BaseRes) ProcessSync() *sync.WaitGroup { return obj.processSync }
|
||||
|
||||
// ProcessExit causes the innerWorker to close and waits until it does so.
|
||||
func (obj *BaseRes) ProcessExit() {
|
||||
obj.processLock.Lock() // lock to avoid a send when closed!
|
||||
obj.processDone = true
|
||||
close(obj.processChan)
|
||||
obj.processLock.Unlock()
|
||||
obj.processSync.Wait()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GroupCmp compares two resources and decides if they're suitable for grouping
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user