This implements a new type of syntactic sugar for the common pattern of
a base class which returns a child class, and so on. Instead of needing
to repeatedly indent the child classes, we can instead prefix them at
the definition site (where created with the class keyword) with the name
of the parent class, followed by a colon, to get the desired embedded
sugar.
For example, instead of writing:
class base() {
class inner() {
class deepest() {
}
}
}
You can instead write:
class base() {
}
class base:inner() {
}
class base:inner:deepest() {
}
Of course, you can only access any of the inner classes by first
including (with the include keyword) a parent class, and then
subsequently including the inner one.
This adds support for `include as <identifier>` type statements which in
addition to pulling in any defined resources, it also makes the contents
of the scope of the class available to the scope of the include
statement, but prefixed by the identifier specified.
This makes passing data between scopes much more powerful, and it also
allows classes to return useful classes for subsequent use.
This also improves the SetScope procedure and adds to the Ordering
stage. It's unclear if the current Ordering stage can handle all code,
or if there exist corner-cases which are valid code, but which would
produce a wrong or imprecise topological sort.
Some extraneous scoping bugs still exist, which expose certain variables
that we should not depend on in future code.
Co-authored-by: Samuel Gélineau <gelisam@gmail.com>
It's valuable to check your runtime values and to shut down the entire
engine in case something doesn't match. This patch adds some magic
plumbing to support a "panic" mechanism.
A new "panic" statement gets transparently converted into a panic
function and panic resource. The former errors if the input is not
empty. The latter must be present to consume the value, but doesn't
actually do anything.
This seems to make things work. I'm worried I might have an ordering bug
where we might choose the wrong precedence if we write ambiguous code
somehow, but at least for now, let's commit this and move on. Hopefully
the nonassoc stuff is actually correct.
Instead of in the lexer. I think this simplifies things and gives the
parser more information which should hopefully make it easier to parse
without shift/reduce conflicts.
It's a normally named function for now, until we think of a common
package to move it into.
Hopefully this makes improving the lexer and parser easier for now. We
can consider bringing it back if needed.
This is a giant refactor to split the giant lang package into many
subpackages. The most difficult piece was figuring out how to extract
the extra ast structs into their own package, because they needed to
call two functions which also needed to import the ast.
The solution was to separate out those functions into their own
packages, and to pass them into the ast at the root when they're needed,
and to let the relevant ast portions call a handle.
This isn't terribly ugly because we already had a giant data struct
woven through the ast.
The bad part is rebasing any WIP work on top of this.
