The old system with vendor/ and git submodules worked great,
unfortunately FUD around git submodules seemed to scare people away and
golang moved to a go.mod system that adds a new lock file format instead
of using the built-in git version. It's now almost impossible to use
modern golang without this, so we've switched.
So much for the golang compatibility promise-- turns out it doesn't
apply to the useful parts that I actually care about like this.
Thanks to frebib for his incredibly valuable contributions to this
patch. This snide commit message is mine alone.
This patch also mixes in some changes due to legacy golang as we've also
bumped the minimum version to 1.16 in the docs and tests.
Lastly, we had to disable some tests and fix up a few other misc things
to get this passing. We've definitely hot bugs in the go.mod system, and
our Makefile tries to workaround those.
The original string interpolation was based on hil which didn't allow
proper escaping, since they used a different escape pattern. Secondly,
the golang Unquote function didn't deal with the variable substitution,
which meant it had to be performed in a second step.
Most importantly, because we did this partial job in Unquote (the fact
that is strips the leading and trailing quotes tricked me into thinking
I was done with interpolation!) it was impossible to remedy the
remaining parts in a second pass with hil. Both operations needs to be
done in a single step. This is logical when you aren't tunnel visioned.
This patch replaces both of these so that string interpolation works
properly. This removes the ability to allow inline function calls in a
string, however this was an incidental feature, and it's not clear that
having it is a good idea. It also requires you wrap the var name with
curly braces. (They are not optional.)
This comes with a load of tests, but I think I got some of it wrong,
since I'm quite new at ragel. If you find something, please say so =D In
any case, this is much better than the original hil implementation, and
easy for a new contributor to patch to make the necessary fixes.
This ensures that docstring comments are wrapped to 80 chars. ffrank
seemed to be making this mistake far too often, and it's a silly thing
to look for manually. As it turns out, I've made it too, as have many
others. Now we have a test that checks for most cases. There are still a
few stray cases that aren't checked automatically, but this can be
improved upon if someone is motivated to do so.
Before anyone complains about the 80 character limit: this only checks
docstring comments, not source code length or inline source code
comments. There's no excuse for having docstrings that are badly
reflowed or over 80 chars, particularly if you have an automated test.
