This adds a simulated engine that can run and test single resources. It
can't test all aspects and features that the engine supports, but is
probably pretty decent for testing the actual CheckApply and Watch
semantics. Be warned that it actually applies changes on your machine,
so please don't write tests that make undesirable changes.
This unbreaks the mcl bindata code. Of course we could change the parser
to allow this prefix, but this is cleaner. The packages still have a
core prefix, which it seems we could also remove, but this isn't
particularly important for anything.
Since the langpuppet GAPI creates fresh new CliContext objects,
it has to make sure to provide the original parent context, because
the child GAPIs expect to be able to access its data.
Due to a limitation in the template library, we need to rename some
functions. It's probably worth looking into modifying this library or
finding an alternate version.
After some investigation, it appears that SocketSet.Shutdown() and
SocketSet.Close() are not synchronous operations. The sendto system call
called in SocketSet.Shutdown() is not a blocking send. That means there
is a race in which SocketSet.Shutdown() sends a message to a file
descriptor to unblock select, while SocketSet.Close() will close the
file descriptor that the message is being sent to. If SocketSet.Close()
wins the race, select is listening on a dead file descriptor and will
hang indefinitely.
This is fixed in the current master by putting SocketSet.Close() inside
of the goroutine in which data from the socket is being received. It
relies on SocketSet.Shutdown() being called to terminate the goroutine.
While this works most of the time, there is a race here. All the
goroutines can also be terminated by a closeChan. If the goroutine
receives an event (thus unblocking select) and then closeChan is
triggered, both SocketSet.Shutdown() and SocketSet.Close() race, leading
to undefined behavior.
This patch ensures the ordering of the two function calls by pulling
them both out of the goroutine and separating them with a WaitGroup.
Co-authored-by: James Shubin <james@shubin.ca>
Test to ensure that SocketSet is nonblocking and will close when
SocketSet.Shutdown() is called. Create a SocketSet that will never
receive any data and leave it running in a goroutine with a WaitGroup
for a second. If Shutdown is working correctly, the goroutine will be
terminated after the timer expires.
Adds a CPU count fact, that can be used to determine how many CPUs are
presently on the machine and ready for use (online). We get this by
reading from a netlink socket to the kernel, and the kernel sends us
uevents when CPUs are added, removed, and brought online or offline.
Whenever one of these events are received, we look in sysfs to update
the fact's Stream with the number of online CPUs.
Add the ReceiveBytes, ReceiveNetlinkMessage, and ReceiveUEvent methods.
This is because not everything passed through a netlink socket cannot
reliably be parsed using the ParseNetLinkMessage function.
With the ReceiveUEvent method, we add support for "uevent" kernel
events, which updates us about the state of devices currently on the
system. To make using this method easier, we add a UEvent struct, that
has the action (what event), Devpath (where the device lives in /proc or
/sysfs), and Subsystem (what subsystem this event belows to).
This continues the earlier patch that allowed resource names to be lists
of strings so that edges can now allow the same. This also includes a
new fancy test!
This greatly expands our test infra to allow us to drop in mcl tests and
look at their resource graph output. The only downside is that this only
runs the function engine once, so if the function graph would be
constantly changing over time, then this is not a good fit here.
I found a case where we had two missing unification rules. Now fixed in
the previous commits, and including this test to show I'm responsible.
I've added the same test in two locations for redundancy and as an
example.
I forgot to ensure that the type of the final expression matched the
type of each of the branches. It's rare, but possible for this to occur.
Luckily, this never would have caused a panic, because the func engine
would have caught the issue anyways, but it's still better we catch it
here first!
I forgot to include these two invariants which are occasionally
necessary, although in most cases they're necessary to prevent incorrect
code from getting past unification. In any case, they would have been
caught by the engine.
