lourenco/mgmt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test: Add a check for too long or badly reflowed docstrings

Browse Source 
This ensures that docstring comments are wrapped to 80 chars. ffrank
seemed to be making this mistake far too often, and it's a silly thing
to look for manually. As it turns out, I've made it too, as have many
others. Now we have a test that checks for most cases. There are still a
few stray cases that aren't checked automatically, but this can be
improved upon if someone is motivated to do so.

Before anyone complains about the 80 character limit: this only checks
docstring comments, not source code length or inline source code
comments. There's no excuse for having docstrings that are badly
reflowed or over 80 chars, particularly if you have an automated test.
This commit is contained in:
James Shubin
2020-01-25 04:05:43 -05:00
parent 525e2bafee
commit f67ad9c061
73 changed files with 775 additions and 410 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
engine/resources/tftp.go
View File

@@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ func (obj *TftpServerRes) Cmp(r engine.Res) error {
// }
//}
// UnmarshalYAML is the custom unmarshal handler for this struct.
// It is primarily useful for setting the defaults.
// UnmarshalYAML is the custom unmarshal handler for this struct. It is
// primarily useful for setting the defaults.
func (obj *TftpServerRes) UnmarshalYAML(unmarshal func(interface{}) error) error {
type rawRes TftpServerRes // indirection to avoid infinite recursion
@@ -275,9 +275,9 @@ func (obj *TftpServerRes) UnmarshalYAML(unmarshal func(interface{}) error) error
return nil
}
// GroupCmp returns whether two resources can be grouped together or not.
// Can these two resources be merged, aka, does this resource support doing so?
// Will resource allow itself to be grouped _into_ this obj?
// GroupCmp returns whether two resources can be grouped together or not. Can
// these two resources be merged, aka, does this resource support doing so? Will
// resource allow itself to be grouped _into_ this obj?
func (obj *TftpServerRes) GroupCmp(r engine.GroupableRes) error {
res, ok := r.(*TftpFileRes) // different from what we usually do!
if !ok {
@@ -582,8 +582,8 @@ func (obj *TftpFileRes) Cmp(r engine.Res) error {
return nil
}
// UnmarshalYAML is the custom unmarshal handler for this struct.
// It is primarily useful for setting the defaults.
// UnmarshalYAML is the custom unmarshal handler for this struct. It is
// primarily useful for setting the defaults.
func (obj *TftpFileRes) UnmarshalYAML(unmarshal func(interface{}) error) error {
type rawRes TftpFileRes // indirection to avoid infinite recursion