Update faq to add etcd vs. consul answer
This commit is contained in:
@@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ I wanted a next generation config management solution that didn't have all of
|
|||||||
the design flaws or limitations that the current generation of tools do, and no
|
the design flaws or limitations that the current generation of tools do, and no
|
||||||
tool existed!
|
tool existed!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
###Why did you use etcd? What about consul?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Etcd and consul are both written in golang, which made them the top two
|
||||||
|
contenders for my prototype. Ultimately a choice had to be made, and etcd was
|
||||||
|
chosen, but it was also somewhat arbitrary. If there is available interest,
|
||||||
|
good reasoning, *and* patches, then we would consider either switching or
|
||||||
|
supporting both, but this is not a high priority at this time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
###You didn't answer my question, or I have a question!
|
###You didn't answer my question, or I have a question!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It's best to ask on [IRC](https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#mgmtconfig)
|
It's best to ask on [IRC](https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#mgmtconfig)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user