lourenco/mgmt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

misc: Fix typos and spelling errors

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Edward Toroshchyn
2025-02-24 15:59:00 +01:00
parent 1f90de31e7
commit c25a2a257b
40 changed files with 62 additions and 62 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
lang/ast/structs.go
View File

@@ -3916,7 +3916,7 @@ func (obj *StmtProg) SetScope(scope *interfaces.Scope) error {
// Track all the bind statements, functions, and classes. This is used
// for duplicate checking. These might appear out-of-order as code, but
// are iterated in the topoligically sorted node order. When we collect
// are iterated in the topologically sorted node order. When we collect
// all the functions, we group by name (if polyfunc is ok) and we also
// do something similar for classes.
// TODO: if we ever allow poly classes, then group in lists by name
@@ -4494,7 +4494,7 @@ func (obj *StmtFunc) TypeCheck() ([]*interfaces.UnificationInvariant, error) {
invariants = append(invariants, invar)
// I think the invariants should come in from ExprCall instead, because
// ExprCall operates on an instatiated copy of the contained ExprFunc
// ExprCall operates on an instantiated copy of the contained ExprFunc
// which will have different pointers than what is seen here.
// nope!
@@ -7398,7 +7398,7 @@ func (obj *ExprFunc) Copy() (interfaces.Expr, error) {
// copied = true // XXX: add this if anyone isn't static?
}
// We wan't to allow static functions, although we have to be careful...
// We want to allow static functions, although we have to be careful...
// Doing this for static functions causes us to hit a strange case in
// the SetScope function for ExprCall... Investigate if we find a bug...
if !copied { // it's static