docs: Explain the langpuppet interface and function

This commit is contained in:
Felix Frank
2018-12-16 01:15:41 +01:00
committed by James Shubin
parent e14b14b88c
commit 9fefadca24

View File

@@ -164,3 +164,152 @@ language features.
You should probably make sure to always use the latest release of
both `ffrank-mgmtgraph` and `ffrank-yamlresource` (the latter is
getting pulled in as a dependency of the former).
## Using Puppet in conjunction with the mcl lang
The graph that Puppet generates for `mgmt` can be united with a graph
that is created from native `mgmt` code in its mcl language. This is
useful when you are in the process of replacing Puppet with mgmt. You
can translate your custom modules into mgmt's language one by one,
and let mgmt run the current mix.
Instead of the usual `--puppet`, `--puppet-conf`, and `--lang` for mcl,
you need to use alternative flags to make this work:
* `--lp-lang` to specify the mcl input
* `--lp-puppet` to specify the puppet input
* `--lp-puppet-conf` to point to the optional puppet.conf file
`mgmt` will derive a graph that contains all edges and vertices from
both inputs. You essentially get two unrelated subgraphs that run in
parallel. To form edges between these subgraphs, you have to define
special vertices that will be merged. This works through a hard-coded
naming scheme.
### Mixed graph example 1 - No merges
```mcl
# lang
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/" { state => "present" }
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/a" { state => "present" }
```
```puppet
# puppet
file { "/tmp/puppet_dir": ensure => "directory" }
file { "/tmp/puppet_dir/a": ensure => "file" }
```
These very simple inputs (including implicit edges from directory to
respective file) result in two subgraphs that do not relate.
```
File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/] -> File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/a]
File[/tmp/puppet_dir] -> File[/tmp/puppet_dir/a]
```
### Mixed graph example 2 - Merged vertex
In order to have merged vertices in the resulting graph, you will
need to include special resources and classes in the respective
input code.
* On the lang side, add `noop` resources with names starting in `puppet_`.
* On the Puppet side, add **empty** classes with names starting in `mgmt_`.
```mcl
# lang
noop "puppet_handover_to_mgmt" {}
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/" { state => "present" }
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/a" { state => "present" }
Noop["puppet_handover_to_mgmt"] -> File["/tmp/mgmt_dir/"]
```
```puppet
# puppet
class mgmt_handover_to_mgmt {}
include mgmt_handover_to_mgmt
file { "/tmp/puppet_dir": ensure => "directory" }
file { "/tmp/puppet_dir/a": ensure => "file" }
File["/tmp/puppet_dir/a"] -> Class["mgmt_handover_to_mgmt"]
```
The new `noop` resource is merged with the new class, resulting in
the following graph:
```
File[/tmp/puppet_dir] -> File[/tmp/puppet_dir/a]
|
V
Noop[handover_to_mgmt]
|
V
File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/] -> File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/a]
```
You put all your ducks in a row, and the resources from the Puppet input
run before those from the mcl input.
**Note:** The names of the `noop` and the class must be identical after the
respective prefix. The common part (here, `handover_to_mgmt`) becomes the name
of the merged resource.
## Mixed graph example 3 - Multiple merges
In most scenarios, it will not be possible to define a single handover
point like in the previous example. For example, if some Puppet resources
need to run in between two stages of native resources, you need at least
two merged vertices:
```mcl
# lang
noop "puppet_handover" {}
noop "puppet_handback" {}
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/" { state => "present" }
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/a" { state => "present" }
file "/tmp/mgmt_dir/puppet_subtree/state-file" { state => "present" }
File["/tmp/mgmt_dir/"] -> Noop["puppet_handover"]
Noop["puppet_handback"] -> File["/tmp/mgmt_dir/puppet_subtree/state-file"]
```
```puppet
# puppet
class mgmt_handover {}
class mgmt_handback {}
include mgmt_handover, mgmt_handback
class important_stuff {
file { "/tmp/mgmt_dir/puppet_subtree":
ensure => "directory"
}
# ...
}
Class["mgmt_handover"] -> Class["important_stuff"] -> Class["mgmt_handback"]
```
The resulting graph looks roughly like this:
```
File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/] -> File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/a]
|
V
Noop[handover] -> ( class important_stuff resources )
|
V
Noop[handback]
|
V
File[/tmp/mgmt_dir/puppet_subtree/state-file]
```
You can add arbitrary numbers of merge pairs to your code bases,
with relationships as needed. From our limited experience, code
readability suffers quite a lot from these, however. We advise
to keep these structures simple.