lourenco/mgmt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

lang: funcs: Fix one small typo and one small logic bug

Browse Source 
I don't think the logic bug had any negative effect, but let's be safe.
This commit is contained in:
James Shubin
2023-10-17 14:41:02 -04:00
parent ee1e07f3d7
commit 1dc6ebbffc
3 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
lang/funcs/structlookup_func.go
View File

@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ func (obj *StructLookupFunc) Unify(expr interfaces.Expr) ([]interfaces.Invariant
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to build function with %d args", l)
}
var invariants []interfaces.Invariant
var invar interfaces.Invariant
// add the relationship to the returned value
invar = &interfaces.EqualityInvariant{
Expr1: cfavInvar.Expr,
@@ -163,9 +166,6 @@ func (obj *StructLookupFunc) Unify(expr interfaces.Expr) ([]interfaces.Invariant
}
invariants = append(invariants, invar)
var invariants []interfaces.Invariant
var invar interfaces.Invariant
// second arg must be a string
invar = &interfaces.EqualsInvariant{
Expr: cfavInvar.Args[1],
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ func (obj *StructLookupFunc) Unify(expr interfaces.Expr) ([]interfaces.Invariant
// XXX: if t1 or t2 are missing, we could also return a
// new generator for later if we learn new information,
// but we'd have to be careful to not do the infinitely
// but we'd have to be careful to not do it infinitely.
// TODO: do we return this relationship with ExprCall?
invar = &interfaces.EqualityWrapCallInvariant{